Immigrants from Oceania vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,220,296 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 13.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,259, a difference of 4.7%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $110,011, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $106,849, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.99%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,798, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.1%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.71%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.4%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.8%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.0%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%).