Nigerian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,934,115 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Nigerian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nigerians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nigerians corresponds to an increase of 55.7 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.6%), median family income ($97,522 compared to $110,011, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,730 compared to $98,586, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,641 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,416 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($45,532 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.16%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.4%), births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.8%).