Russian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,762,581 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $45,804, a difference of 16.1%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $56,302, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $98,586, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $65,854, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.1%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.7%).