South American vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,797,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.0%), median family income ($101,856 compared to $110,011, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,837 compared to $106,849, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($46,804 compared to $48,229, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($54,492 compared to $56,302, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 38.4%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.7%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%).