Celtic vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Zimbabweans

Average
Exceptional
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,322,688 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 103.0 Zimbabweans.
Celtic Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,193 compared to $90,618, a difference of 8.9%), median family income ($101,139 compared to $110,011, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $65,854, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $56,302, a difference of 3.8%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricCelticZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
26.3%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.5%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticZimbabwean
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
84.0%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.1%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
6.4%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.5%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Celtic vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.5%).
Celtic vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricCelticZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%