Immigrants from Portugal vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,669,628 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $65,854, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($100,984 compared to $110,011, a difference of 8.9%), and per capita income ($42,412 compared to $45,804, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%), median earnings ($47,304 compared to $48,229, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $56,302, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.3%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%).