Yakama vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yakama
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yakama
Zimbabweans
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Yakama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,825,750 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.709% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 709.4 Zimbabweans.
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $45,804, a difference of 38.8%), median family income ($83,932 compared to $110,011, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $98,586, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $65,854, a difference of 17.1%).
Income Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,009 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,932 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,225 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,107 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,002 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,354 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,321 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,226 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,992 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,234 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Fair 26.3% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 125.9%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 119.6%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.3%), single male poverty (15.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.1%).
Poverty Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.3% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.9% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 111.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 101.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 18.4% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.8% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.3%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 100.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 52.9%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 31.0% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 12.9% | Good 6.4% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 105.6%), master's degree (9.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 87.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.0% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 74.5% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 46.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.4%).
Disability Metric | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.00% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.3% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |