Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Okinawans

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Okinawan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,337,769 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Okinawan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Okinawans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Okinawans corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Zimbabweans.
Okinawan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,817 compared to $45,804, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,349 compared to $98,586, a difference of 21.1%), and median male earnings ($67,232 compared to $56,302, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,701 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,846 compared to $65,854, a difference of 7.6%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$55,817
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$129,979
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,624
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,550
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,232
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,905
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,701
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,349
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,796
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,846
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Fair
26.3%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.98%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.6%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and divorced or separated (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
62.5%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.1%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Good
6.4%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
73.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
69.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
57.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Okinawan vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricOkinawanZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%