Dominican vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Dominican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Dominicans

Zimbabweans

Tragic
Exceptional
590
SOCIAL INDEX
3.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
342nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Dominican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,528,805 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Dominican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dominicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dominicans corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Zimbabweans.
Dominican Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,964 compared to $65,854, a difference of 40.2%), median family income ($82,888 compared to $110,011, a difference of 32.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,623 compared to $106,849, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($37,046 compared to $40,798, a difference of 10.1%), and median earnings ($41,864 compared to $48,229, a difference of 15.2%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricDominicanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,697
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,888
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,302
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,864
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,204
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,046
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,633
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,229
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,623
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$46,964
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
26.3%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 125.3%), married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 103.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.9%), single male poverty (15.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father poverty (19.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricDominicanZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
9.5%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 58.9%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 58.5%), and unemployment (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDominicanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDominicanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
84.0%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 51.4%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 38.9%), and married-couple households (38.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.3%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDominicanZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.5%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 225.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 28.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 62.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 80.5%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDominicanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.7%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Good
6.4%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 85.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricDominicanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.5%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Dominican vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.5%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Dominican vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricDominicanZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%