Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Zimbabweans

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,487,707 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 86.9 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $56,302, a difference of 12.5%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $45,804, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $98,586, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.35%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.2%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $90,618, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.3%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), female disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%