Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Costa Ricans
Zimbabweans
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Costa Rican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,795,005 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 26.8 Zimbabweans.
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.8%), median family income ($103,989 compared to $110,011, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $98,586, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $48,229, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,090 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,989 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,262 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,645 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,279 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,622 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,106 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,565 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,779 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,638 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Fair 26.3% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.2%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.3%), single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Poverty Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.3% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.7% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.9%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.9% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.4% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.4% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.6% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.7% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Average 15.0% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |