Swiss vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,477,083 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.9%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $40,798, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.46%), median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $98,586, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.7%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.2%), bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%).