Lithuanian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,737,979 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 167.7 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.2%), median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $56,302, a difference of 8.7%), and per capita income ($49,448 compared to $45,804, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.99%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.2%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $90,618, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.75%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.6%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.7%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.9%).