Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,526 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.4%), median family income ($100,962 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $106,849, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.7%), median earnings ($46,478 compared to $48,229, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,010
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,962
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Good
$85,818
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Average
$46,478
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,168
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,328
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,201
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,423
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,943
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,656
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.8%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.33
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.8%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.5%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrantsZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%