Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,890,586 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to an increase of 87.0 Zimbabweans.
Sri Lankan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $51,259, a difference of 8.2%), per capita income ($44,014 compared to $45,804, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $98,586, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.29%), median earnings ($48,040 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.39%), and median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.74%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Fair
26.3%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 24.4%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.95%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
84.0%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.68%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.4%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.3%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
6.4%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 76.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.40%), disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.87%).
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%