Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Zimbabweans
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,099,368 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Zimbabweans.
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,295 compared to $110,011, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $106,849, a difference of 21.8%), and per capita income ($37,766 compared to $45,804, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $40,798, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 16.3%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Fair 26.3% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 72.5%), receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 52.1%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.1%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.93%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 6.4% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 100.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.0%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |