Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Egyptians

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Egyptian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,713,131 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Zimbabweans.
Egyptian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,095 compared to $56,302, a difference of 8.5%), median earnings ($51,701 compared to $48,229, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,282 compared to $98,586, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.63%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and median family income ($114,119 compared to $110,011, a difference of 3.7%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,358
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,119
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,673
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,701
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,095
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,305
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,444
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,282
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,256
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,441
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Fair
26.3%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.8%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.34%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
84.0%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Good
6.4%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 69.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%

Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), female disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricEgyptianZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%