Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cheyenne
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cheyenne
Zimbabweans
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Cheyenne Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,132,957 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to an increase of 117.5 Zimbabweans.
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $106,849, a difference of 39.9%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $90,618, a difference of 35.3%), and median family income ($81,385 compared to $110,011, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $40,798, a difference of 14.4%).
Income Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,276 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $81,385 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,974 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,233 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,062 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,673 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,275 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,152 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $76,362 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,096 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Fair 26.3% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 131.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 86.6%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.2%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 33.4%).
Poverty Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.1% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 151.3%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 105.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.3% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.6% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 44.1%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.20, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.2% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.3% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.47 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.3% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 6.4% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 57.8%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.7% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Cheyenne vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (31.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Cheyenne | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.9% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |