Slavic vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slavic
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slavs
Zimbabweans
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Slavic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,215,268 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.449% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 448.7 Zimbabweans.
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.7%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $90,618, a difference of 4.9%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $110,011, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $48,229, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,049 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Good $105,144 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,398 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,470 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,390 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,613 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,563 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,377 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,629 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,709 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Fair 26.3% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.3%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.6% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.95%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Good 6.4% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.4%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.7% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Slavic vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Disability Metric | Slavic | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |