Immigrants from Laos vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,747,825 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 14.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $45,804, a difference of 21.0%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $110,011, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $106,849, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $40,798, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 45.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 82.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 65.1%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.9%).