Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yugoslavians

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,289,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to an increase of 27.2 Zimbabweans.
Yugoslavian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.1%), median household income ($82,186 compared to $90,618, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($100,119 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.45%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($53,967 compared to $56,302, a difference of 4.3%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,792
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,119
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,186
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,846
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,967
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,028
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,368
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$97,558
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,243
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
26.3%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Good
6.4%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.3%

Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Yugoslavian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricYugoslavianZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%