Nicaraguan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,988,691 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $65,854, a difference of 20.9%), median family income ($92,231 compared to $110,011, a difference of 19.3%), and per capita income ($39,372 compared to $45,804, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $40,798, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $48,229, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 64.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.20, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.5%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.44%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%).