Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Zimbabweans
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,477,206 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 17.0 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $98,586, a difference of 19.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($93,593 compared to $110,011, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $51,259, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $40,798, a difference of 7.5%), and median earnings ($43,416 compared to $48,229, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Fair 26.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.0%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.60%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Good 6.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.71%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |