Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South America

Zimbabweans

Average
Exceptional
4,371
SOCIAL INDEX
41.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
200th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from South America Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,788,595 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from South America Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $65,854, a difference of 11.3%), median family income ($100,414 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,126 compared to $106,849, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($46,548 compared to $48,229, a difference of 3.6%), and per capita income ($44,068 compared to $45,804, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,068
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,414
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Average
$85,611
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Average
$46,548
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,962
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,643
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,268
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,042
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,126
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,151
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.7%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.7%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
32.0%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 21.3%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.18%), female disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from South America vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South AmericaZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%