Chilean vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Zimbabweans
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,494,437 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Zimbabweans.
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $65,854, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $110,011, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,605 compared to $90,618, a difference of 0.020%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.10%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Fair 26.3% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.21%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.010%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Good 6.4% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.95%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |