French vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
French
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French
Zimbabweans
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in French Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,161,737 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Zimbabweans.
French vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($83,468 compared to $90,618, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($46,296 compared to $48,229, a difference of 4.2%).
Income Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,685 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,368 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,468 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,296 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,350 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,457 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,230 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,665 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,824 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,656 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Fair 26.3% |
French vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.6%), single father poverty (18.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.4% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
French vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
French vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.1% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
French vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.5%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 28.7% |
French vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.4% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Good 6.4% |
French vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.8%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.4% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.9% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.4% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
French vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.7%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.9%).
Disability Metric | French | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |