Hawaiian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,543,694 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $45,804, a difference of 16.3%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $56,302, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($98,869 compared to $110,011, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.4%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 52.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.4%).