Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Spaniard
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Spaniards

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
3,805
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
210th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Spaniard Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,659,345 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Spaniard communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spaniards within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spaniards corresponds to an increase of 11.0 Zimbabweans.
Spaniard Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($101,617 compared to $110,011, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,866 compared to $65,854, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($84,644 compared to $90,618, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,117 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.28%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($54,401 compared to $56,302, a difference of 3.5%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,028
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,617
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Average
$84,644
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,059
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,401
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,656
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,117
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,366
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,889
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,866
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
26.3%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.5%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.37%), single male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and single mother poverty (30.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Poor
13.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
11.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
84.0%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
28.7%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.4%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and bachelor's degree (36.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
59.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Spaniard vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSpaniardZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%