Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bahamian
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bahamians
Zimbabweans
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Bahamian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,926,780 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to an increase of 78.6 Zimbabweans.
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($82,631 compared to $110,011, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $106,849, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $98,586, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $51,259, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($39,735 compared to $48,229, a difference of 21.4%).
Income Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,427 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,631 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,726 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,735 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,756 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,125 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,743 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,395 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,369 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,000 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 79.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 62.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.7%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.1%).
Poverty Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.8% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.91%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.9% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.1% | Good 6.4% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.3%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Education Level Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.4%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.090%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Bahamian | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |