Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bahamians

Zimbabweans

Tragic
Exceptional
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Bahamian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,926,780 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to an increase of 78.6 Zimbabweans.
Bahamian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($82,631 compared to $110,011, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $106,849, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $98,586, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $51,259, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($39,735 compared to $48,229, a difference of 21.4%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricBahamianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,427
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,631
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,726
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,735
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,756
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,125
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,743
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,395
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,369
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,000
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.2%
Fair
26.3%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 79.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 62.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.7%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.1%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricBahamianZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.2%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBahamianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBahamianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.0%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBahamianZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.91%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBahamianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Good
6.4%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.3%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricBahamianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Poor
95.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.4%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.090%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Bahamian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricBahamianZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%