Houma vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,308,423 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 145.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $106,849, a difference of 48.2%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $65,854, a difference of 46.9%), and wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $56,302, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,259, a difference of 15.6%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $48,229, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 94.8%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 87.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 28.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 81.3%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 62.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.1%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 137.1%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 134.5%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 124.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 78.9%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 75.4%), and ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.9%).