Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bolivian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bolivians

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
8,880
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
42nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Bolivian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,871,445 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Bolivian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bolivians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bolivians corresponds to an increase of 121.0 Zimbabweans.
Bolivian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($58,506 compared to $51,259, a difference of 14.1%), median household income ($102,195 compared to $90,618, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($74,245 compared to $65,854, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($43,445 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($52,005 compared to $48,229, a difference of 7.8%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricBolivianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,526
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,479
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$102,195
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,066
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,445
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,506
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,372
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$118,871
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$74,245
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Fair
26.3%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.2%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricBolivianZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.5%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.51%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBolivianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBolivianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
84.0%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (49.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.83%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.8%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBolivianZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.7%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBolivianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.4%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricBolivianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.5%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.0%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Bolivian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricBolivianZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%