Immigrants from Guatemala vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,648,749 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 9.7 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $110,011, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $106,849, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $65,854, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,798, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 76.2%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.5%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.3%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%).