Icelander vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,596,127 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 61.5 Zimbabweans.
Icelander Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $65,854, a difference of 7.5%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $90,618, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $110,011, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.020%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($44,987 compared to $45,804, a difference of 1.8%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
26.3%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
84.0%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.7%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.2%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.4%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Icelander vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Icelander vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderZimbabwean
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%