Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puerto Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puerto Ricans

Zimbabweans

Tragic
Exceptional
244
SOCIAL INDEX
0.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
347th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Puerto Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,777,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Zimbabweans.
Puerto Rican Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($70,423 compared to $110,011, a difference of 56.2%), householder income over 65 years ($42,550 compared to $65,854, a difference of 54.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,234 compared to $106,849, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $51,259, a difference of 29.0%), median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $40,798, a difference of 29.3%), and median earnings ($35,560 compared to $48,229, a difference of 35.6%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,268
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,423
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,197
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,560
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$40,071
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$31,560
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$39,726
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$65,996
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,234
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$42,550
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
18.7%
Fair
26.3%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 209.7%), receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 173.9%), and family poverty (20.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 160.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 59.4%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 74.8%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
25.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 83.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (16.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 80.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (18.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
58.1%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.1%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.9%
Exceptional
84.0%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 59.2%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.1%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
45.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 71.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 29.7%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Good
6.4%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.2%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.62%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 97.6%), self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.8%).
Puerto Rican vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricPuerto RicanZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.2%