Finnish vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Finnish
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Finns
Zimbabweans
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Finnish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,972,934 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Zimbabweans.
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($83,607 compared to $90,618, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $56,302, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $98,586, a difference of 4.2%).
Income Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,461 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,676 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,607 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,940 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,721 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,173 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,827 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,610 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,904 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,535 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Fair 26.3% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.8%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.9% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Good 6.4% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 25.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Finnish vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Disability Metric | Finnish | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |