Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Spanish American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Spanish Americans

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
1,871
SOCIAL INDEX
16.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
284th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Spanish American Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,990,894 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Spanish American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish Americans corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Zimbabweans.
Spanish American Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($90,322 compared to $110,011, a difference of 21.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,836 compared to $106,849, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($75,386 compared to $90,618, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($46,913 compared to $51,259, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($36,391 compared to $40,798, a difference of 12.1%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,012
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,322
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,386
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,316
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,008
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,391
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,913
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,722
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,836
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,021
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Fair
26.3%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.3%), receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 47.7%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.3%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Exceptional
84.0%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 34.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
28.7%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
6.4%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 35.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.3%

Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.1%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Spanish American vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSpanish AmericanZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%