Panamanian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,286,082 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 128.7 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.0%), median family income ($97,683 compared to $110,011, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,066 compared to $106,849, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.69%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $40,798, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($45,593 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.37%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%).