Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Zimbabweans
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Cape Verdean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,514,102 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Zimbabweans.
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $65,854, a difference of 31.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $106,849, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($91,848 compared to $110,011, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.25%), median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $40,798, a difference of 5.7%), and median earnings ($44,640 compared to $48,229, a difference of 8.0%).
Income Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,935 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,848 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,848 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,640 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,103 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,614 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,387 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,758 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,580 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,077 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Fair 26.3% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 122.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Poverty Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.7%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.4% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.5% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 44.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 38.1% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.9% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.3% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 72.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 35.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.5% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 46.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.0% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Good 6.4% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.1%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.0% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.3% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.8% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.9% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Cape Verdean vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Cape Verdean | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |