Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Blackfeet
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Blackfeet

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
1,951
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
279th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Blackfeet Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,837,224 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Zimbabweans.
Blackfeet Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,717 compared to $110,011, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $106,849, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($73,509 compared to $90,618, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $51,259, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $40,798, a difference of 13.8%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,695
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,717
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,509
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,822
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,402
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,864
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,603
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,531
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,595
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,029
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.2%
Fair
26.3%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.1%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.6%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.6%), single male poverty (15.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.6%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.5%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.2%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.4%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Poor
92.0%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.8%).
Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricBlackfeetZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%