Arab vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arab
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arabs
Zimbabweans
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Arab Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,603,535 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to an increase of 229.7 Zimbabweans.
Arab vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.8%), median family income ($106,952 compared to $110,011, a difference of 2.9%), and median household income ($88,398 compared to $90,618, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.20%), and per capita income ($45,662 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.31%).
Income Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,662 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,952 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,398 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,599 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,298 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,718 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,219 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,336 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,566 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,266 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Fair 26.3% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 38.6%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and family poverty (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.45%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Poverty Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Fair 9.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Good 29.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.2% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.7%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Family Structure Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.2% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Good 6.4% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.6% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.9% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Arab vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.2%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Arab | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |