Arab vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Arab
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Arabs

Zimbabweans

Average
Exceptional
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Arab Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,603,535 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to an increase of 229.7 Zimbabweans.
Arab Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Arab vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.8%), median family income ($106,952 compared to $110,011, a difference of 2.9%), and median household income ($88,398 compared to $90,618, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.20%), and per capita income ($45,662 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.31%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricArabZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,662
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,952
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,398
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,599
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,298
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,718
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,219
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,336
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,566
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,266
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Fair
26.3%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 38.6%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and family poverty (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.45%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricArabZimbabwean
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Fair
9.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArabZimbabwean
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArabZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.7%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArabZimbabwean
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArabZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Good
6.4%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricArabZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Arab vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.2%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Arab vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricArabZimbabwean
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%