Turkish vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Turkish
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Turks
Zimbabweans
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Turkish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,024,509 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Zimbabweans.
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $45,804, a difference of 14.4%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $56,302, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $98,586, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $65,854, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $51,259, a difference of 5.9%).
Income Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,391 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $121,202 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $99,389 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,919 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $64,253 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,695 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,266 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,318 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $117,814 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,037 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Fair 26.3% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Labor Participation Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.7% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.66%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Good 6.4% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.5% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.7% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.5% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.0%), female disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |