German Russian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,855,290 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 27.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $52,631, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $40,958, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $55,327, a difference of 0.050%), median family income ($93,858 compared to $94,466, a difference of 0.65%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $91,357, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 31.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 37.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (60.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 125.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 17.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 0.42%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%).