Immigrants from Uganda vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,392,392 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 62.4 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $91,357, a difference of 13.4%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $94,466, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $52,631, a difference of 0.49%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $40,958, a difference of 0.54%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $45,820, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.0%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 19.5%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 137.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 18.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.8%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.1%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.4%).