Asian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,249,919 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 39.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $91,357, a difference of 29.6%), and median family income ($119,955 compared to $94,466, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $52,631, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $40,958, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $45,820, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 65.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 42.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 34.1%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.0%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 36.1%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (66.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 164.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 64.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 52.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.3%).