Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,158,935 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.147% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 146.8 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $55,412, a difference of 13.7%), median household income ($78,682 compared to $82,449, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $94,842, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,472 compared to $94,109, a difference of 0.38%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $88,198, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.1%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households (62.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.75%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.1%).