Immigrants from the Azores vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,101,158 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.154% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 153.8 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.1%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $59,141, a difference of 13.5%), and median male earnings ($53,503 compared to $48,646, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,138 compared to $94,842, a difference of 0.75%), median family income ($95,402 compared to $94,109, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($39,608 compared to $38,858, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.54%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 9.9%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.48, a difference of 8.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (65.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.8%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (78.7% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.11%), 5th grade (95.1% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 105.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.1%).