Blackfeet vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,404,085 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.975% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 975.0 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $55,412, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($73,509 compared to $82,449, a difference of 12.2%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $48,646, a difference of 0.50%), median earnings ($41,822 compared to $42,912, a difference of 2.6%), and per capita income ($37,695 compared to $38,858, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 24.4%), single male poverty (15.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.71%), currently married (44.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 85.2%), high school diploma (88.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and 10th grade (93.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.74%), bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.5%).