Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Salvadoran
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Salvadorans
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Salvadoran Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,629,231 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 55.3 Salvadorans.
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $88,198, a difference of 10.9%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $94,109, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $37,083, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,646, a difference of 0.39%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $82,449, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $55,412, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $38,858 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $94,109 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Poor $82,449 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $42,912 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $48,646 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $37,083 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $55,412 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $88,198 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $94,842 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Poor $59,141 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.0% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 68.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), poverty (13.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.6%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 130.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 68.7%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 18.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 82.0% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.4%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 0.13%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.48, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 29.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 44.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.48 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 36.0% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.1%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 126.0%), college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 91.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 90.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 89.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 87.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 86.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 84.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 81.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 78.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 57.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 51.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 39.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tsimshian vs Salvadoran Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 121.2%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 21.1%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Salvadoran |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 25.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 48.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |