Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,763,536 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $38,858, a difference of 38.5%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $48,646, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $88,198, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $55,412, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $59,141, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 45.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.47%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.1%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 47.8%), and births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.48, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 100.6%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 86.0%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 71.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.9%).