Scottish vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,747,025 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 84.9 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $86,109, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $93,781, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $38,511, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($46,463 compared to $44,767, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $59,248, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.1%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.7%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.77%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 53.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (60.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.5%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.4%).